Luke 18:9-14
“Equal Mercy”
28 August 2016 St. Andrew’s
Military Chapel Singapore
Anyone remember group projects
during school? The ones where you get paired up with people you don’t like or,
more frustrating, people that won’t or can’t carry their share of the load.
Those in the group who just don’t try, don’t offer any real insight to the
planning and execution of the assignment. It’d be fine if they’d at least
participate in the construction of the model, share some of the typing, or just
go buy snacks to fuel the mad rush towards completion the night before.
Yet, despite offering absolutely no
tangible help or support in the overall success or failure, they get the same
grade as the ones that pull the all-nighters and do all of the heavy lifting
over the duration of the project.
Even if you try to address it with
the teacher, the most likely response to your pleading cries of mercy from the
all-powerful teacher is “play the hand you are dealt” or something very
similar.
Then you ponder the situation in
which you are doing more than required and all of the work while someone else
does nothing and gets the same reward or punishment and realize it happens in
more places than school. We find this scenario playing out in thousands of
places and situations all around us. It makes us mad.
Then we hear today’s Scripture and
realize when we feel that way in our daily lives we are just like the Pharisee
in this parable. We’ve done all the work and should be the one getting all of
the glory. If life was fair, each person on the project would be rated
separately by their individual contribution to the goal. If God was fair and
just, then the tax collector wouldn’t receive the same justification as the
righteous.
When we think that mercy and
forgiveness in the kingdom work in some karma like fashion, we miss the point
of the kingdom. The Kingdom’s economy doesn’t make much sense to us, but I’m
not sure it was designed to make human sense. That’s a hard pill to swallow,
because we don’t like that kind of economic system.
It’s hard not to sympathize with the
tax collector. He’s at the temple praying for mercy, what we all should pray
every time we encounter the divine. He’s also a pretty brave, and brazen, man.
In that day, he wasn’t high on the list of people other Jews would want to hang
out with.
That’s probably why he was sitting in the back pew, as far
away from everyone else as he could possibly get. He may even have been doing
everything in his power to find a quiet corner and wedge himself into the
building to keep from being seen. A tax collector was seen as a combination of
collaborator with Rome and extortionist of his fellow countrymen.
Yet, for
reasons we aren’t told, he enters the temple and asks for mercy and
forgiveness. What’s so disturbing is that those hearing Jesus tell the story,
as well as us here today, know that he deserves that mercy and justification
before God. And we know he will walk away with the mercy he requests and
desires.
The Pharisee in this story isn’t a typical Pharisee, in fact
he’s probably a humorous caricature going above and beyond what most people do.
Jesus describes him in this way to make a point. But, it isn’t a negative point
about purity codes, scorn directed at Pharisees or the temple, nor about
personal righteousness.
Our nameless Pharisee has done everything right, goes above
and beyond what is required of him. He probably isn’t doing this to prove his
merit and worthiness of salvation, he knew he was justified before God. He is
thanking God for his calling and ability to live into a deep relationship with
God. I doubt God was upset at the fact he was listing his righteousness in his
prayer. God was probably disappointed that the Pharisee was comparing his deeds
with another’s. A fact of the story that most likely shocked those listening to
Christ because Pharisees weren’t known back then to dismiss members of the
community, even tax collectors.
The real provocation in this parable is the relationship
between these two extreme examples. The saintly Pharisee and the repentant tax
collector are both embellished examples designed to provoke and prove a point.
The translation of one single word can make a significant difference
in how an entire event is interpreted. In verse 14, there is a small Greek
word, para. The NIV, NKJV, and NRSV all translate it as rather than. “This man
went down to his home justified rather than the other.” Making para a
comparative term is a perfectly valid way to translate it into English.
However, para is also the root for the word parallel. Those
that remember geometry know that parallel lines travel infinitely together,
alongside. In this translation, the two men would leave equally justified and
in receipt of the same mercy.
Because parables are not designed to reinforce stereotypes
but are told to shatter myths and provoke us, I think the second translation is
the better choice. Having the tax collector leave full of mercy and the
Pharisee empty handed is what we expect, it’s what we want. We want to see the
boastful knocked down a peg or two. We want a rags to riches story, we love
second chances provided it fits our narrative.
Both of these men have done things that displeased God. The
tax collector stole from family members through his business practice to make
some money, but he was just working within the system. The Pharisee has done
everything right, even more than expected. He just made one mistake, praying a
competitive prayer, and we jump all over him as getting his just desserts. They
both need mercy, and they both walk away with the mercy they need.
Isn’t both of them walking away full of mercy the crazier
ending, the more provocative way to end the story? It’s harder for us to hear
and accept that God’s mercy is boundless and there for everyone. No matter how
many times we come to the table, get what we need and still see the leftovers
at the table, we’re naturally going to assume that mercy is scarce or only
available for those who aren’t sinners. For then we don’t have any control over
whom we get to spend eternity with.
Over the last few weeks as we’ve been journeying through
these parables, I’ve been reading a book called Short Stories by Jesus. The
author, Amy-Jill Levine, reads para as parallel so verse 14 reads, “this man
went down to his home justified alongside the other.”
She then states that from this reading, “We see that divine
grace cannot be limited, for to limit this grace would be to limit the divine.
This unlimited generosity is something many of us find problematic. We are
quite happy when we are saved; we are less happy when this salvation is
extended to people we do not like, especially when our dislike is bolstered by
seemingly very good reasons such as, “He’s a sinner.”
She also explored this parable at play in our group project
setting. “The [member], whom we dismissed as lazy, as stupid, or as unable to
contribute, may well have done what he could. He may have felt himself
unworthy; indeed, the others may have signaled to him that we were disappointed
he was assigned to our group. He trusted in us; he trusted in the system. Had
we been more generous with him rather than resentful, we would have learned
more as well. And what if he didn’t care at all? What if he depended on us,
even thought we were fools for doing his work for him? What we do is still
worthwhile. We can afford to be generous. There are other systems of justice in
which his contributions or sins will be assessed.”
What we do is worthwhile and we can afford to be generous.
Where are we like the Pharisee and need to be more generous and merciful to
those who we feel are dragging us down or using the system? Where are we like
the tax collector and need the system to help us out, need the system to give
us a break? Perhaps this parable is Jesus telling us he cares more about how we
love our neighbor and spread mercy and justice generously without question rather
than how we get into heaven.